|
by:
Ieuan Dolby The
world is no longer right when the two words, Engineer and Insurance are used together,
side by side in a conversation. Individually they are words that justify their
use, with their own explanations and own meanings as those that compile dictionaries
see fit! They each serve their own purpose until such a time as when they are
used in the same sentence or even on the same page. Engineer and Insurance cannot
be used together anymore, yes there was a time when this topic had no base but
here and today it can be seen that the words are not in any sense synonymous with
each other. The
dictionary tells us that, insurance is “a thing providing protection against a
possible event” or “money paid to insure against something or by an insurance
company in the event of damage, injury, etc”. Well, that tells us something although
it is a bit confusing. The
dictionary tells us that an Engineer is “a person qualified in Engineering” and
also it says that an Engineer is “a person who controls an Engine or a Machine”.
And there we have it. It is sad that one cannot now look up “Insurance Engineer”
or Engineering Insurance” to gain some valuable insight into what is involved
and to shed some light on this matter. What
sadly and inadvertently sparked this subject was by what an Engineering Superintendent
once said to a Ships Engineer whilst they supped beer in a bar one night. The
Engineer was naturally complaining about the lack of spares that are made available
to the ships he was on. NB: This is a frequent grumble of Engineers and probably
does have value and meaning the world over, no company liking to part with expensive
spares if they can help it. Anyway, the Superintendent, true to form agreed with
the ships Engineer and blamed everything on the paper pushing bosses upstairs,
current ships budgets and the economy, thus he followed all the usual avenues
that Superintendents typically use in this regard. The superintendent unfortunately
took one too many sips of his beer and forgetting that he had long since crossed
the fence from Ships’ staff to Office staff, let slip a snippet of conversation
that he had either been party to or that his big ears had accidentally sounded
out. The
statement was relayed like this: “It is not our policy to purchase spares for
our vessels, we would rather wait until the equipment fails and then claim it
back on Insurance”. Stunned
is the word that comes to mind. Shock, disbelief and outrage could follow close
second. The Engineer and the Superintendent naturally turned to other topics like
discussing fellow Engineers and their faults before finally retiring to their
respective beds and forgetting all about what had been discussed. Except for the
Engineer who for some reason or other could never quite rid the Superintendents
“slip” from his mind. And can anyone blame him? Engineers
struggle to perform their duties within parameters given and in often harsh and
unforgiving environments but given the essential shore back up they invariably
perform their duties well and to a high degree of end performance and safety standards.
The dictionary states quite clearly that Engineers are qualified persons looking
after machinery. Machinery needs both adequate spares and Engineers to provide
a safe working environment and to keep the machinery and equipment in satisfactory
working order. A machine that is awaiting a future Insurance Claim is not a safe
working machine and the Engineer has failed in his duty to keep the Machine or
Engine functioning. From an Insurance point of view an Engineer and required spares
are the “things” that provide protection against a possible event.
Due to modern
systems of communication and the fact that spares are readily available in most
ports of the world it is not common practice to build up large stocks of spares
on vessels. It is largely entrusted and accepted by Engineers and Office staff
alike that when the Engineer orders spares he does so because he needs them. He
orders spares through the company whilst retaining the knowledge that they should
arrive at the next port of call or at the latest within one month or so. The Engineer
furthermore orders them because he predicts a use for them. By placing such an
order he is, without his being fully aware of doing so, enacting Insurance on
the Machinery that he has ordered spares for. He is providing protection against
a probable event, which in this case is his Insurance to keep the machine or engine
in a functional and safe working condition – as prescribed by the duties of an
Engineer. To
recap in simplified form: The Engineer insures his machinery by replacing worn
or used parts as he sees necessary to maintain a certain piece of equipment in
a satisfactory working and safe condition. The
Company in this regard have failed in their duty to the Engineer, by not supplying
the necessary spares as the Engineer deems necessary to fulfill his duties.
Insurance
contributions or money paid to an Insurer is a costly business when considering
the size and scale of what is involved. To wait for failure and thus save money
on spares and to have the cost attributed to failure, with the subsequent repair
of the equipment paid for by the Insurance Company, must seem “great” to the Ship
Owner/Manager. There he is having his money returned to him by those who take
most out of his budget and into the bargain the Insurance Company pay for all
damages invoked by the failure, stoppage times and subsequent replacement of the
failed equipment. An
Engineer who is working on a vessel where spares will not be sent out upon request
becomes a useless Engineer. Now preferably called a Caretaker with no skills or
interest in insuring his property simply due to a lack of usable items to effect
such. An Engineer is (was) Insurance against equipment failure as long as he has
at his disposal the spares necessary – without these he negates any Insurance
that goes with the title of Engineer. He is qualified to maintain and look after
engines and equipment, but he only becomes Insured (the ‘thing’) if he has the
necessary backup from ashore. Take that back-up away and we are left with a qualified
yet uninsured Engineer. He cannot perform his duties satisfactorily, he cannot
give insurance that his machines will perform well and safely under his care,
he cannot fulfill his duties in any shape or form whatsoever and thus is a liability
to all concerned. An
Engineer has thus become through no fault of his own an Insurance liability to
all concerned and that is why we cannot use Engineer and Insurance in the same
sentence – it hurts and badly.
| About
The Author Ieuan
Dolby, from Scotland is an Engineering Officer in the Merchant Navy. He has been
travelling the world for 15yrs on an endless tour of cultural diversification.
Currently based in Singapore he writes various articles for magazines and newspapers
and is working on a marine glossary.
ieuandolby@lycos.com
| |